The leaked emails between top climate scientists recently has shown purposeful manipulation of climate data to demonstrate more global warming than is actually occurring. Many scientists are furious about the emails because they have been ostracized for many years due to their skepticism about man caused global warming.
But how does this relate to you and what does it mean for the average Joe or Jane in America? Here’s what it means. Climategate shows that scientists, particularly those that have a vested interest in the climate change idea, are fluffing up their arguments with doctored evidence and suppressing reasonable dissent that shows facts backing up lack of global warming.
“The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.” That is a quote from one of the emails detailing the fact that there is a noticeable lack of warming going on. This is not only proving that there is significantly less warming than scientists are letting on, but also proves that there is an insane amount of dishonesty and lying going on to get money spent on the hoax.
Another email states:
“This was the danger of always criticising the skeptics for not publishing in the “peer-reviewed literature”. Obviously, they found a solution to that–take over a journal! So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering “Climate Research” as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…What do others think?”
“I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”“It results from this journal having a number of editors. The responsible one for this is a well-known skeptic in NZ. He has let a few papers through by Michaels and Gray in the past. I’ve had words with Hans von Storch about this, but got nowhere. Another thing to discuss in Nice !” Since when, in science, does someone discredit another scientist simply because he disagrees with your point? These scientists involved in climategate have a vested interest in making sure the public is deceived into believing that climate change is happening.
Now, it pertains to us in that we are staring down a Cap and Trade bill that will raise our electricity rates, threaten our sovereignty and break the backs of small business and individuals unnecessarily. We need to stand up and say, “NOT ONE RED PENNY FOR A FRAUD!!!”