Sharpton Threatens to Sue Limbaugh

October 18, 2009

In the latest twist in the Al Sharpton/Rush Limbaugh spat, Al Sharpton has threatened to sue Rush Limbaugh if he doesn’t repudiate statements he made in a recent Wall Street Journal editorial. In the opinion piece the Maha Rushie states that Sharpton played a “leading role in the 1991 Crown Heights riot”. Sharpton denies being part of the riot.

Sharpton and his crew are always playing the same game, trying to shut up conservatives that point out that race hustlers like Sharpton and Jessie Jackson don’t speak for black people and that people can alleviate their own problems without groups like the NAACP and the governments ‘help’. The truth is, if Sharpton speaks for all black people than Limbaugh speaks for all white people. And the truth is, neither is true. Sharpton shares the values of some black people like Limbaugh has the same values of white people.

This is not about the Crown Heights Riot or the WSJ opinion piece. This is all out war on a man’s right to speak out against the PC machine that is running Washington and most politics today. In America you can’t talk about God or country without offending someone. You can’t sing Christmas carols for fear of offending Muslims, atheists or Buddhists. You can’t place a flag on your locker without it being considered potentially distracting to others. (See Firefighter Flag Flap) Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Glenn Beck and others are the antithesis of what the left is trying to accomplish. They are trying to force Americans into an artificial silence where real discussion is stymied because of race, politics, religion or other polarizing issue.

Americans don’t want this. We are a vocal people by nature. We enjoy debate and thrive on civil discourse. And knowing that, the founding fathers created the Constitution to protect the rights of those who are prepared for a vigorous but respectful debate. The first amendment is designed specifically to nullify the left’s attempts at silencing the majority of Americans. Because if our Constitution is followed, freedom is automatically guaranteed. But I digress.

Al Sharpton is not content to simply ruin Limbaugh’s run at becoming part owner of the Rams, he also wants to drag the man through the mud so that his credibility is affected and Americans won’t listen to him. The obvious intended effect is that another outspoken opponent of political correctness and liberalism is silenced and the right becomes a little more quiet, shy and tamed. Because if the right is silent, the only other direction is left.

America, you don’t want only left. Look at Cuba, look at Venezuela. That is where left alone leads.


Rush Limbaugh and the War on Conservatism

October 16, 2009


   Well the left is back at it. They’re crowing over their win in keeping Rush Limbaugh out of the NFL. It’s a victory for the left! Rush Limbaugh can keep his dirty, racist, sexist self out of the NFL for good.

   Am I the only one offended by the dragging of this man’s name through the dirt by reverse racists like Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson? Since when could Sharpton say this about white people, “White folks was [sic] in caves while we was building empires…. We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.” and yet he has the audacity to claim another man is a racist because of one remark that he made? For those who want to know, here is EXACTLY what Rush Limbaugh said, “Sorry to say this, I don’t think he’s been that good from the get-go… I think what we’ve had here is a little social concern in the NFL. The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. There is a little hope invested in McNabb, and he got a lot of credit for the performance of this team that he didn’t deserve. The defense carried this team.”

   Does this sound racist to you? Do you know how many black defensive players are and were on the Eagles defense when he made those remarks? He clearly was not attacking McNabb but was attacking the media’s constant need to turn everything into a race-based qualifying issue. At that time, and still to this day there are very few prolific black quarterbacks. That is not a bad thing, it is not a good thing. It is what it is. The liberal media wants everything to become about race as evidenced by the constant lamenting over the lack of back head coaches in college football. Since when did one’s qualifications have anything to do with the color of your skin?

   For instance, if I am a black athletic director and have a mostly black school, am I obligated to give the head coaching job to a white coach because he is a minority at the school even though there is a more highly qualified black coach? NO! I am trying to win, whether the coach is black, white, purple, red, orange or yellow. That goes for everyone. You should be hired or fired based upon your performance and skills, not whether you are a minority or not. But I digress.

   It is just another left wing smear job of an American that decided to speak out against the outrageously moronic establishment of political correctness and the liberal mindset in our culture.